On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 07:23:16PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi Rich, > > > -- it would preclude advance creation of a file actions object which > > will open or dup onto high fd numbers at a later time after the rlimit > > has been increased. > > This is a highly theoretical use-case, isn't it? > > If you think POSIX should not specify things the way it does, please > report it to the Austin Group.
If you read the rest of my email beyond the 2.5 lines quoted above, I said it's not clear to me that POSIX requires what you think it does in this case. If you disagree with that, we should open a request for interpretation. Rich
