On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 7:56 AM Bruno Haible <[email protected]> wrote: > > Paul Eggert wrote: > > Thanks, those patches all look good to me. > > OK, pushed. > > There are still similar oldies (apollo, DGUX, NeXT) in getloadavg.c, that > are still there for no good reason. But they are not introducing significant > complexity.
Thanks, indeed. Happy to see you erase traces/burden of those memories.
