Hi Akim, > Ok. But since really, this tool is not for high quality profile, > but just to get cost estimates, I did not aim at that level of > precision. ... > Also, I don’t think it makes sense to have more than 2 digits > of precision: we are very likely to be within noise already > with 2.
Not all programs take more than 1 second of run time. If a program takes 0.03 seconds of run time, and the 'wall clock' column would give me a good understanding of what's going on if printed with 6 decimal places, why do you want to truncate it to 2 decimal places? (It's clear that the 'CPU user' and 'CPU system' columns will not be useful in this situation; I don't argue for 2 vs. 3 decimal places on these columns.) Bruno
