Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
It does look like a correct change, but what I am worried from glibc
standpoint is if it would require a compatibility implementation
(potentially mapping RE_SYNTAX_{E}GREP to old definition on compat symbol).
I doubt whether that would be needed (or, as Zack writes, helpful) in this case. (Neither RE_SYNTAX_GREP nor RE_SYNTAX_EGREP are documented in any way, amusingly enough, so one cannot say we're changing documented behavior....)
