On 19/12/2017 15:43, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 12/19/2017 04:52 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: >> Again, my understanding is we still aim to keep it in sync with gnulib, >> so I think we should first integrate with current gnulib code on glibc >> side (in same approach as we did for current glob changes). > > As I understand it, Arnold's patches are against glibc. Arnold, would it be > too much trouble to rebase them against gnulib instead? I could take a look > at the result. I expect that many (most?) of these changes are already in > Gnulib, so the result should be easier for you to generate than the original > (and also be easier for me to review). > > CC:ing this to bug-gnulib. For gnulib readers, this thread starts here: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-12/msg00237.html >
I will check on sync glibc regex with gnulib so the possible step will require less work.
