On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> wrote: > Konstantin Serebryany wrote: >> >> But some patches are not applied to Gnulib: >> e.g. in Glibc's commit 39a12f8db4656bec88ebd51e524778ef2e5468b9 or >> 8c0ab919f63dc03a420751172602a52d2bea59a8 > > > That's only because we haven't synced from glibc to gnulib since August. > >> Do you have a suggestion regarding the patch discussed in >> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-09/msg00663.html? >> The patch does not lead to a functionality change, but affects the >> sources significantly (560 line diff) >> >> Is that ok to apply it only to Glibc? >> Or would you like to have it for Gnulib too? > > > We'd apply it for Gnulib too, as we prefer to keep the sources in sync as > much as possible.
Great! >That patch applies only to "#ifdef _LIBC" code, right? Most of it, at least. Thanks, --kcc > So Gnulib users shouldn't care about the change anyway.
