Paul Eggert wrote: > I thought about that, but my kneejerk reaction was that the likelihood that a > new architecture would come in without C11 support was low enough (and > declining) that it didn't seem worth the trouble of adding a dependency on > the > longlong module.
OK. > But perhaps I'm underestimating how long Microsoft will take -- is that the > main > worry here? I was more worrying about architectures that are different from all we know so far. But you're right: They will most likely provide the C11 support themselves, by then. Bruno
