Hi/2. Paul Eggert wrote: > KO Myung-Hun wrote: >> * lib/fts.c (fts_build): Do not check dir_fd on OS/2 kLIBC. > > I'm afraid this change needs more explanation. If the problem is that > dirfd returns -2, the earlier part of fts_build will return when that > happens, so that problem cannot be fixed by the patch that you sent. >
First of all, sorry. I've misread codes. Essential problem is that kLIBC dup() does not work on a directory fd. So this patch tries to use a path instead of fd. And dirfd() always returns -2 as I said before. But dirfd() is executed only if continue_readdir is true. > What actually goes wrong if the change is omitted? For examples, rm -rf fails like this. ----- rm.exe: traversal failed: 'g:\\ex\\t': Bad file number ----- -- KO Myung-Hun Using Mozilla SeaMonkey 2.7.2 Under OS/2 Warp 4 for Korean with FixPak #15 In VirtualBox v4.1.32 on Intel Core i7-3615QM 2.30GHz with 8GB RAM Korean OS/2 User Community : http://www.ecomstation.co.kr
