Daiki Ueno <u...@gnu.org> writes: > Given that the intention of the above test is to check if the iconv > function works properly, maybe a workaround would be to use the fixed > prototype of iconv (as attached)?
Sorry, that was obviously wrong. The other idea is to suppress the error with a pragma, but I guess it would be better to actually check the prototype in AM_ICONV_LINK. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno