Daiki Ueno <u...@gnu.org> writes:

> Given that the intention of the above test is to check if the iconv
> function works properly, maybe a workaround would be to use the fixed
> prototype of iconv (as attached)?

Sorry, that was obviously wrong.  The other idea is to suppress the
error with a pragma, but I guess it would be better to actually check
the prototype in AM_ICONV_LINK.

Regards,
--
Daiki Ueno

Reply via email to