On 06/01/2014 12:39 AM, Geoff wrote: > I am (would be) _very_ happy - ecstatic even - about my present situation. My > concern is one regarding certain memory leaks I found I could not avoid with > regard to parent processes. I had hoped to limit the page tables accessed by > these parent processes; although it appears I may not have fully done the > best I could with regard to this. But by personal opinion is that it should > not pose a critical security issue. > > Instead, I seem to be reading in the documentation much more to the effect of > “bugs are normal”. This I get. I can work out my bugs. What I’m unclear about > is whether these leaks are/were sufficient such that management feels this > program is no longer viable...?
Your mail is missing some context. I have no idea _which_ program you are complaining about, or if there is a pointer to an earlier email thread that has more background on the subject. Are you reporting a bug against gnulib? -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
