On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> >> What about the conflict with modules/streq? >> There are over 300 uses of STREQ in gnulib and coreutils. >> Are you suggesting to change all of those? > > > Yes. But if this is too much all at once, let's just call the inline > function 'STREQ'. We can rename it to 'streq' later, if and when we have > the energy. > > 'STRNEQ' I'd still rather avoid, though. The name is simply too confusing > with strncmp. Plus, the usual way to spell 'not equals' (dating all the way > back to FORTRAN) is 'ne', not 'neq'.
That sounds reasonable for gnulib and coreutils, since they don't use STRNEQ.
