On 27 March 2014 20:03, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> wrote: > On 03/27/2014 07:14 AM, Will Newton wrote: >> >> It seems highly unlikely that anyone has a NeXT system with a >> pre-2.0 gcc still working. This change will ease merging with glibc. > > > I agree that block of code is no longer needed, but why would it ease > merging to remove it? glibc still has the code.
The use of the NeXT macro causes a warning with -Wundef which glibc now enables by default. Rather than updating the conditional it seems better to just remove it. -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro