On 27 March 2014 20:03, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
> On 03/27/2014 07:14 AM, Will Newton wrote:
>>
>> It seems highly unlikely that anyone has a NeXT system with a
>> pre-2.0 gcc still working. This change will ease merging with glibc.
>
>
> I agree that block of code is no longer needed, but why would it ease
> merging to remove it?  glibc still has the code.

The use of the NeXT macro causes a warning with -Wundef which glibc
now enables by default. Rather than updating the conditional it seems
better to just remove it.

-- 
Will Newton
Toolchain Working Group, Linaro

Reply via email to