On 01/14/2014 06:53 PM, Baruch Siach wrote: > Hi Pádraig, > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 05:46:50PM +0000, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> I noticed this issue from: >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.uclibc.buildroot/73294 >> >> I've not tested the following on uclibc, but does the attached patch fix it? >> (you just need to patch the m4/spawn_h.m4 file in coreutils to test this) > > I guess it should fix the problem, but it would be better to fix uClibc. The > posix_spawn feature is not present yet in any released version of uClibc, > only > in the development tree. My proposed uClibc patch > (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.uclibc.general/23700) moves > posix_spawn to libc for compatibility with glibc.
OK great. I'll hold applying this so until the outcome of that is decided. > The direct cause of build failure at > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/ab1/ab1250c3d402ec3fbaf22eeffd07de218ffafb22/build-end.log > > though, is not the mis-detection of posix_spawn, but that for some reason the > alternative gnulib implementation doesn't see the members of the > posix_spawn_file_actions_t struct. I have not figured out how this happens. thanks, Pádraig.
