On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:08:04AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > Michal complained that setting MALLOC_CHECK_ for the entire configure > slowed things down.
That's funny because... > #endif > +#ifdef M_CHECK_ACTION > + mallopt(M_CHECK_ACTION, 2); > +#endif > + ... this should have the same effect as MALLOC_CHECK_, i.e. it should enable the extra checking and slow things down in the same manner as MALLOC_CHECK_. However, it looks like we don't do __malloc_check_init for M_CHECK_ACTION, which is what initializes the additional checks. Does anyone know if it is intentional? It looks like a bug to me. Siddhesh
