On 06/01/2013 08:14 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > Please consider placing extern "C" around the sig2str and str2sig > declarations inside sig2str.h similar to the attached diff/changeset. We're > looking at using the sig2str routine in Octave and removing some code from > that project that is similar to what sig2str but not up-to-date with all the > Unix SIG definitions that might exist.
Thanks, done. > I would also like you to consider the issue of duplicate signal definitions > (i.e., different SIGxxxx using the same number such as SIGCHLD and SIGCLD). > Right now, sig2str will return only one string associated with the signal > number (first appearance) even though internally the structure numname[] > contains a complete list. If someone wants to know all definitions, then > sig2str doesn't really indicate that. What do people think? Should there be > a routine that provides a complete listing? I suppose it wouldn't hurt...
