Re: [PATCH] test-lchown, test-chown: also skip test if lchown/chown fails with EPERM

[Pádraig Brady]

On 05/22/2013 12:01 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> I found this one while testing the new nap() code on FAT
> (as a non-root user).
> 
> WDYT?

That makes sense.

EPERM is not tested/generated in the replacements,
so adding that avoidance would have no impact
on the test coverage.

I added a Changelog entry and applied.

thanks!
Pádraig.