Daiki Ueno <u...@gnu.org> writes: > Patch attached.
Sorry, wrong patch. Please check the attached one instead. I've confirmed that HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE is defined by default on 10.8, but not with CFLAGS=-mmacosx-version-min=10.6. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno
>From eb742ec35bfd68288bfc23aae47e3d27dcaff4de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daiki Ueno <u...@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 10:40:55 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] lock: work around pthread recursive mutexes bug in Mac OS X 10.6 * m4/lock.m4: Don't define HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE if the compilation target is Mac OS X 10.6. Problem reported by parafin and Andoni Morales in <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?37844> and <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gettext/2013-05/msg00007.html>. --- ChangeLog | 9 +++++++++ m4/lock.m4 | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 13dafaa..2590e4a 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +2013-05-11 Daiki Ueno <u...@gnu.org> + + lock: work around pthread recursive mutexes bug in Mac OS X 10.6 + * m4/lock.m4: Don't define HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE if the + compilation target is Mac OS X 10.6. + Problem reported by parafin and Andoni Morales in + <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?37844> and + <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gettext/2013-05/msg00007.html>. + 2012-05-10 Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattar...@gmail.com> deps: require Automake >= 1.9.6 in generated Makefile fragments diff --git a/m4/lock.m4 b/m4/lock.m4 index d3fc1ef..e7aedec 100644 --- a/m4/lock.m4 +++ b/m4/lock.m4 @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ AC_DEFUN([gl_LOCK], [[ #if __FreeBSD__ == 4 error "No, in FreeBSD 4.0 recursive mutexes actually don't work." +#elif defined __ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__ && __ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__ < 1070 +error "No, in Mac OS X < 10.7 recursive mutexes actually don't work." #else int x = (int)PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE; return !x; -- 1.7.10.4
