On 04/23/2013 11:16 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:54:03AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> I'm still thinking the gnulib patch should be applied though, > > Since the regression in glibc was detected by this gnulib test, > I'm not sure ignoring all EAI_SYSTEM errors would be a good idea.
That's a happy accident. gnulib tests should not be worrying about glibc internals IMHO I notice the proposed glibc patch above has no associated tests? I presume there are glibc units tests that should be updated? >> as you wouldn't want to indicate a gnulib issue if you ran >> out of file descriptors on the system for example? > > Lets skip the test in case of EAI_SYSTEM && (EMFILE || ENFILE) then. There are many other things that could trigger here. thanks, Pádraig.
