On 3/20/2013 6:49 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 03/19/13 11:43, marco atzeri wrote:
it does not seem to work:
Thanks, we did make some progress, but not enough. How about this
patch instead? This affects Solaris, too. I tested it on Solaris 9
but do not have a 2.6 host to test it on; perhaps Tom can do that.
Sorry, it fails again.
For you convenience I uploaded the gcc -E output
for 3 cases
http://matzeri.altervista.org/works/include/
patch reversed, that works
system_libsystem_la-lo-sysdep.E_pre_OK
current version
system_libsystem_la-lo-sysdep.E_post
2nd trial
system_libsystem_la-lo-sysdep.E_patch2
comparing the first two I think it is a problem of sequence
in the include chain
Regards
Marco
