Akim Demaille wrote:
> Le 6 juil. 2012 à 16:09, Jim Meyering a écrit :
>
>> You're welcome to leave the pipe-to-sed.
>> Worrying about an extra process when processing a diagnostic
>> is probably a pre-optimization anyhow. Besides, then
>> we don't have to worry about whether $me is printf-safe.
>
> But we have to worry about ',' in $me, which is $0, not
> its basename. Do you want me (Akim, not the variable)
> to change me (the variable, not Akim; not that I am
> immutable) to basename and use / in the sed command,
> instead of ','?
>
> # warnf_ FORMAT-STRING ARG1...
> warnf_ ()
> {
> warnf_format_=$1
> shift
> printf "$warnf_format_" "$@" | sed "s,^,$me: ," >&2
> }
Good point.
In that case, we might as well do it right, along the lines Paul
suggested, maybe like this:
warnf_ ()
{
warnf_format_=$1
shift
nl='
'
case $me in
*[$nl\\%]*) me=$(echo "$me"|tr "$nl" '?')
printf "$warnf_format_" "$@" | sed "s!^!$me: !" ;;
*) printf "$me: $warnf_format_" "$@" ;;
esac >&2
}
