On 05/01/2012 11:19 PM, Akim Demaille wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Sorry for the delays,
No problem. > > Le 25 avr. 2012 à 19:36, Eric Blake a écrit : > >> On 04/07/2012 05:48 AM, Akim Demaille wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> I would like bison to used gnulib's build-aux/po/Makefile.in.in, >>> but I don't understand how I am supposed to do that. bison's >>> bootstrap is sync'ed with that of gnulib (the current master). >> >> Revisiting this topic, WHY are we trying to use gnulib's >> build-aux/po/Makefile.in.in? > > To address a bug in gettext that hits the packages that use it: > install-pdf and such other recursive targets are not supported. > > See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gettext/2011-05/msg00008.html > for the first report, and > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gettext/2012-04/msg00003.html > for its recent reactivation. I think I figured it out, and that we reached an acceptable compromise: if you _want_ the latest and greatest gettext support, use the 'gettext' module, and get Makefile.in.in from gnulib; if you want stable gettext support (and don't mind GNU Coding Standard compliance), use the 'gettext-h' module and get Makefile.in.in from autopoint instead. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-04/msg00164.html Meanwhile, no one ever reviewed my proposed doc patch: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-04/msg00167.html -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
