Joel E. Denny wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I think the result is an improvement, but it is still not as readable as I
>> would like, or maybe it's just not as readable as I am used to ("git log"
>> output). Why? ... Because when some clumped entries are adjacent to a
>> multi-paragraph one, the style dichotomy makes it a little harder to see
>> that each of the clumped entries does indeed correspond to its own commit.
>>
>> What I guess I'm saying is that I see your point of view.
>> If you ever write the patch you want, with some new option,
>> I'll probably apply it here.
>
> Below is a patch that adds a --no-cluster option, which I believe does
> what Stefano wants. I want it too. OK to push?
Hi Joel,
Thanks. That looks fine, but please adjust the preceding comment
to keep in sync with the new behavior.
> @@ -305,7 +311,8 @@ sub parse_amend_file($)
> # If this header would be different from the previous date/name/email/
> # coauthors header, or if this or the previous entry consists of two
> # or more paragraphs, then print the header.
> - if ($date_line ne $prev_date_line
> + if ($no_cluster
> + or $date_line ne $prev_date_line
> or "@coauthors" ne "@prev_coauthors"
> or $multi_paragraph
> or $prev_multi_paragraph)
