On 11/30/11 02:10, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> the philosophy behind the manywarnings module is
> to enable all possible kind of warnings that you can get from gcc

Hmm, OK, but in that case, shouldn't it be called "allwarnings"
rather than "manywarnings"?  I got the impression from its name
that it doesn't enable every warning in sight....

Reply via email to