Paul Eggert wrote: > >> * Why does dup2.c need to use 'inline'?... > > > > Do you know the optimizing behaviour of MSVC, or are you making assumptions? > > It's the other way around, no? If we don't know the optimizing > behavior then we should omit "inline".
I disagree. It's good and normal programming style to add 'inline' in front of all static functions that are only used once in the compilation unit. Bruno -- In memoriam Safia Ahmed-jan <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safia_Ahmed-jan>
