Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 06:54:32PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>Michael Stone wrote:
>>> This one was actually in gnulib; what's the best way to pursue it?
>>>
>>> FAIL: test-getcwd (exit: 16)
>>> ============================
>>
>>Hi Michael,
>>
>>Thanks for the report.
>>I'll Cc bug-gnulib, but to start with, note that test-getcwd.c's main
>>does this:
>>
>> return test_abort_bug () + test_long_name ();
>>
>>and the first can return 0 or 2,3,4 or 5, while
>>the latter can return only two values smaller than 16:
>>10 and 11.
>
> or 4 & 12, or am I missing something?
No. I missed the 12.
> at the point where it sets
> fail=12, AT_FDCWD is -100 and errno is 2 (ENOENT)
Then maybe your system has problems with long names?
What is errno when getcwd returns NULL here?
/* If libc has the bug in question, this invocation of getcwd
results in a failed assertion. */
cwd = getcwd (NULL, 0);
if (cwd == NULL)
fail = 4; /* getcwd didn't assert, but it failed for a long name
where the answer could have been learned. */
Can you tell me how to reproduce this?
