On 09/11/11 08:14, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> gcc has it : http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fint128.html
> (at least for 64bits)

I'd be leery of any attempt to define a system type wider than
intmax_t.  Too many things will break.  It might be OK to use
__int128 for specialized internal purposes (cryptography comes
to mind), but not for common external interfaces such as uid_t.

Reply via email to