Bruno Haible wrote: >> + * See also RFC 3548<http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3548.txt>. > > Would is not be better to refer to RFC 4648 > <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4648.txt>? It obsoletes the older RFC > 3548.
Yes, that would be better. (This is one of the things I copied from the base64 module.)
Gijs
