Hi Eric,

> There are still a few modules, like iconv_h.m4, that still
> use older paradigms where GNULIB_POSIXCHECK is unsupported
> and where gl_REPLACE_<HEADER>_H is still essential.  But since
> we are moving away from that style, I see no reason to keep
> the idiom for the modules that don't need it.

I agree. Replacing the headers unconditionally is stable enough by now.
It's unlikely that we will switch back to the older idiom.

This patch 1/2 is fine.

PATCH 2/2 looks wrong, though. More on this in a separate mail.

Bruno
-- 
In memoriam Peter van Pels <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_van_Pels>

Reply via email to