Paul Eggert wrote: > On 02/22/2011 07:57 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> I omitted getloadavg.c since it had so many violations >> and is soooo crufty, and since Paul just got it into emacs. >> However, considering the number of cpp conditionals, it might >> benefit from the conversion. Paul, what do you think? > > I have no objections. > > Though I hope you mind that I don't volunteer; the > cruft-to-actual-utility ratio is pretty high in that one.
I think getloadavg.c holds the record on that front, which is why I haven't spent any time on it in ages. There's no point even in indenting its cpp directives. lipstick on a pig. > I'm reasonably sure that many of its sections are completely > obsolete and wouldn't work properly even if the corresponding > operating systems were actually used. If you have a bit of time to > look at the code, it may be better to spend the time ripping out > craft rather than reindenting it. No, thanks ;-)
