Paul Eggert wrote: > This suggests that we should use the name "stdint" for the > common case, and some other name for the rare case of > applications that need WINT_MIN etc. It'd be easy to > create a module "stdint-with-wchar" to do that
I disagree that "common" vs. "rare" should be guiding criterion here. It's more important that a user gets a fully correct and fully POSIX compliant <stdint.h> when he asks for the module name that most immediately comes to mind, namely 'stdint'. Looking for a module with fewer dependencies is optimization. It's OK that for optimizating you need to investigate a little more the available set of modules, until you find 'stdint-sans-wchar'. We use this approach already for the modules 'strstr' and 'strstr-simple'. Bruno -- In memoriam Khosrow Golsorkhi <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khosrow_Golsorkhi>
