On 08/17/10 23:17, Eric Blake wrote: > libvirt is currently LGPLv2+
Can this be changed to LPGLv3+? That'd solve the problem. > Is it worth relaxing the license on the *printf-posix family of modules > to LGPLv2+ from their current LGPLv3+, or is this too big of a request? I dunno, at some point we should be encouraging people to switch to LGPLv3+. > since using umaxtostr penalizes 32-bit machines for converting to the > 64-bit intermediary, maybe it's worth adding a size_t variant? That would be fine. The *tostr routines were mainly written for two reasons. First, for platforms that can't/couldn't portably and reliably output wide integers. Second, speed. > What a shame that POSIX omitted an <inttypes.h> PRIu* for size_t. We could add one in gnulib, no?
