Eric, Paul Eggert wrote: > unless this offsetof bug occurs in real code, it might > be better to not worry about it.
I agree. It's the first time in my life that I see someone doing 'sizeof' of an 'offsetof' expression. It's not a realistic use of the 'offsetof' macro. And the workaround is trivial: just add parentheses. It also makes the code easier to read: sizeof (offsetof (struct d, e)) is less ambiguous than sizeof offsetof (struct d, e) Bruno
