On Tuesday 27 April 2010 23:42:07 Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/27/2010 03:24 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > * lib/getdate.y (RELATIVE_TIME_0): Avoid a stupid 'const object should
> > have initializer' warning.
> >
> > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ typedef struct
> > #if HAVE_COMPOUND_LITERALS
> > # define RELATIVE_TIME_0 ((relative_time) { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 })
> > #else
> > -static relative_time const RELATIVE_TIME_0;
> > +static relative_time const RELATIVE_TIME_0 = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
>
> I would have used:
>
> static relative_time const RELATIVE_TIME_0 = { 0 };
> unless that also triggers a stupid warning.
Why, if we have the exact same initializer two lines above?
Thanks,
Andreas
