On Apr 23, 2010, at 3:04 PM, ext Paul Eggert wrote:

> Jarno Rajahalme <jarno.rajaha...@nsn.com> writes:
> 
>> So it seems that the aim is for the gnulib/stdint.h types and the
>> macros be consistent with the system versions. If so, why not use the
>> system versions for defining them, if they exist?
> 
> Because the system versions are often wrong.  gnulib/m4/stdint.m4
> contains a fairly strict test of the system version, and if this test
> fails, we don't trust the system version.
> 
>> -#if LONG_MAX >> 31 >> 31 == 1
>> +/* OSX needs int64_t to be "long long" rather than "long int" */
>> +#if LONG_MAX >> 31 >> 31 == 1 && !(defined (__APPLE__) && defined 
>> (__MACH__))
> 
> This is not the Autoconf Way.  We should instead test (in stdint.m4)
> that the system stdint.h defines int64_t to an appropriate type, and if
> so, set a flag that stdint.in.h uses to avoid redefining int64_t.  Can
> you write a patch along those lines?


Sorry, I can't parse stdint.m4. If it is up to me, it'll take some time to come 
up to speed with the Autoconf Way.

  Jarno

Reply via email to