Eric Blake wrote:
> POSIX does not specify openpty, so this comment is misleading.
Oops, you're right. Fixed:
2010-03-21 Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org>
Fix comments.
* lib/forkpty.c (rpl_forkpty): Fix comment.
* lib/openpty.c (rpl_openpty): Likewise.
Reported by Eric Blake.
--- lib/forkpty.c.orig Mon Mar 22 21:07:11 2010
+++ lib/forkpty.c Mon Mar 22 21:06:27 2010
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#if HAVE_FORKPTY
-/* Provider a wrapper with the precise POSIX prototype. */
+/* Provide a wrapper with the prototype of glibc-2.8 and newer. */
# undef forkpty
int
rpl_forkpty (int *amaster, char *name, struct termios const *termp,
--- lib/openpty.c.orig Mon Mar 22 21:07:11 2010
+++ lib/openpty.c Mon Mar 22 21:06:28 2010
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#if HAVE_OPENPTY
-/* Provider a wrapper with the precise POSIX prototype. */
+/* Provide a wrapper with the prototype of glibc-2.8 and newer. */
# undef openpty
int
rpl_openpty (int *amaster, int *aslave, char *name,
