According to Ralf Wildenhues on 1/17/2010 2:40 AM: >> I think you've nailed it - fts-lgpl isn't really being used anywhere. >> We originally offered it as a way to port glibc's fts to platforms >> that lacked fts altogether, but glibc's fts is so much worse than >> gnulib's that it hasn't been worth trying to maintain. Maybe we >> should just delete the module, and require GPL? Or maybe someone can >> provide a better argument why library-safe directory recursion is >> still an important goal, even if it is slower because it can't rely on >> openat optimizations. > > No further comments on this so far, so I'll propose this patch. > > Cheers, > Ralf > > Remove fts-lgpl module. > > * modules/fts-lgpl: Remove. > * MODULES.html.sh (func_all_modules): Adjust. > * check-module (find_included_lib_files): Adjust. > * m4/fts.m4 (gl_FUNC_FTS_LGPL): Remove.
Digging through my backlog. A couple day window waiting for complaints has now turned into a month of silence, so I've now applied this patch. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
