Eric Blake wrote: > I noticed this while bootstrapping m4; <ignore-value.h> stood out like a sore > thumb when sorted among the list of system headers, when all other gnulib- > specific headers used by m4 used "". Any objections to this patch? I did not > touch eealloc, although that is another module that could probably be changed > in the same manner. > > > From: Eric Blake <e...@byu.net> > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:42:55 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] ignore-value: update recommended header name > > * modules/ignore-value (Include): Only use <> for headers that > exist in glibc. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <e...@byu.net> > --- > ChangeLog | 6 ++++++ > modules/ignore-value | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog > index ee23708..9779709 100644 > --- a/ChangeLog > +++ b/ChangeLog > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ > +2010-01-25 Eric Blake <e...@byu.net> > + > + ignore-value: update recommended header name > + * modules/ignore-value (Include): Only use <> for headers that > + exist in glibc.
Yes, please push that. > -<ignore-value.h> > +"ignore-value.h"
