Bruno Haible wrote: > About the exec* functions: >> Ad 1): >> > I suggest you declare those functions with the "nonnull" attribute. >> >> Good idea. I reported this to glibc: >> <http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11056> > > It has been committed: gcc+glibc will now warn if a user uses a NULL > argv array in an execv* call or a NULL argv[0] in an execl* call. > > But the gcc warnings can cover only 7 out of 11 cases. Therefore the kernel > behaviour is more important. Is there anyone who could help out and test the > proposed Linux kernel patch?
I'd volunteer, but have too much on my plate for the next few days.
