Hi all,

Is Windows CE [1] a reasonable portability target for GNU packages?
I'm being told that there is a free development environment called CeGCC [2].
Both the Microsoft development environment and this one provide only a
rudimentary C library: according to [3] it has even less functions than
Windows, namely:
  - no <assert.h>
  - no <errno.h>
  - no <fcntl.h>
  - no <locale.h>
  - no <signal.h>
  - no <time.h>

Care or don't care?

Bruno


[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_CE
[2] http://cegcc.sourceforge.net/
[3] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms861487.aspx


Reply via email to