Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 10/30/2009 01:38 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> According to Jim Meyering on 10/30/2009 6:29 AM:
>>>>>>> +eval '(exit $?0)'&& eval 'exec perl -wS "$0" ${1+"$@"}'
>>>>>>> +& eval 'exec /usr/bin/perl -wS "$0" $argv:q'
>>>> shouldn't that be perl, rather than /usr/bin/perl?
...
> I'd also change -wS to -S since the script can "use warnings" if it
> wants, but shouldn't be forced to. Some other scripts use -0777 or -T.
I definitely want to keep the -w.
If you're writing Perl without warnings enabled,
you'd better have a very good reason, and can certainly
manage the extra effort of applying s/wS/S/ to those two lines --
along with a comment justifying it, I'd expect.
