Pádraig Brady wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> Pádraig Brady wrote: >> >>> p.s. I'll look at bypassing stdio on input to see >>> if I can get at least the 2% back >> >> IMHO, even if it did, it would not be worth it. > > Right, a quick test here shows only a 0.8% gain from > bypassing stdio. However I also noticed that the > digest routines in gnulib do fread(4096). > Bumping that up to 32KiB gives a 3% boost.
Nice. > That would be increased even more if more efficient > checksumming routines are used (which is on the horizon). > Note the coreutils min was bumped to 32KiB recently: > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commit;h=55efc5f > > Does anyone have any objections to increasing > the stack requirement by 28672 bytes? That sounds reasonable to me, too. No objection here.
