Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I noticed the use of ignore-value() recently and
> was a little confused by it. How about the attached tweaks
> to make it explicit it doesn't handle all return types
> and also remove the use of __attribute__ ((__unused__))
> which I don't think is required.
I think you're right that __attribute__ ((__unused__)) is unnecessary here.
While "(void)" does not quiet gcc's warn_unused_result attribute warning,
it does do the job for an otherwise unused parameter.
> Subject: [PATCH] ignore-value: support old compilers and pointer types
>
> * lib/ignore-value.h: Add a function to suppress warnings
> from fuctions that return pointers, and to make it explicit
> that one function doesn't handle all cases. Also don't use
> __attribute__ ((unused)) as it's too verbose/non standard
Regarding the log message, I don't think there's a problem with portability.
Either that __attribute__ directives is used and accepted, or gcc is so
old that it doesn't support it, so it's compiled out -- but when gcc
is that old, we don't have to worry about warn_unused_result attributes
either, so that's fine. Hmm... I guess you could be thinking about
warnings from non-gcc compilers. Yes, that's another way in which
(void)i is better.
How about this adjusted patch?
>From af0fafc96bfa9ba20b9786d945d27401f05038ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?P=C3=A1draig=20Brady?= <p...@draigbrady.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:37:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ignore-value: handle pointer types, too
* lib/ignore-value.h (__attribute__): Remove definition.
(ignore_value): Remove use of "__attribute__ ((unused))" in favor
of a more concise and more-often effective "(void) i" statement.
(ignore_ptr): New function to suppress warnings from functions that
return pointers, and to make it explicit that one function doesn't
handle all cases.
---
ChangeLog | 10 ++++++++++
lib/ignore-value.h | 20 ++++++--------------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 952e5c8..fb7d7dd 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+2009-08-26 Pádraig Brady <p...@draigbrady.com>
+
+ ignore-value: handle pointer types, too
+ * lib/ignore-value.h (__attribute__): Remove definition.
+ (ignore_value): Remove use of "__attribute__ ((unused))" in favor
+ of a more concise and more-often effective "(void) i" statement.
+ (ignore_ptr): New function to suppress warnings from functions that
+ return pointers, and to make it explicit that one function doesn't
+ handle all cases.
+
2009-08-25 Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org>
dup2: work around a Linux bug.
diff --git a/lib/ignore-value.h b/lib/ignore-value.h
index 5f97c91..86cfad7 100644
--- a/lib/ignore-value.h
+++ b/lib/ignore-value.h
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-/* ignore a value to quiet a compiler warning
+/* ignore a function return without a compiler warning
- Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+ Copyright (C) 2008-2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -17,13 +17,7 @@
/* Written by Jim Meyering. */
-#ifndef __attribute__
-# if __GNUC__ < 2 || (__GNUC__ == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 8)
-# define __attribute__(x)
-# endif
-#endif
-
-/* Use this function to avoid a warning when using a function declared with
+/* Use these functions to avoid a warning when using a function declared with
gcc's warn_unused_result attribute, but for which you really do want to
ignore the result. Traditionally, people have used a "(void)" cast to
indicate that a function's return value is deliberately unused. However,
@@ -38,8 +32,6 @@
"copy.c:233: warning: ignoring return value of 'fchown',
declared with attribute warn_unused_result". */
-static inline void
-ignore_value (int i __attribute__ ((__unused__)))
-{
- /* empty */
-}
+static inline void ignore_value (int i) { (void) i; }
+static inline void ignore_ptr (void* p) { (void) p; }
+/* FIXME: what about aggregate types? */
--
1.6.4.1.341.gf2a44
