-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 According to Paolo Bonzini on 8/23/2009 10:22 AM: > This can be committed as is but it is not enough. You have to always > use a replacement (thus define the emulation as rpl_accept4) and check > whether accept4 works at runtime (and similarly for pipe2) and fall back > to accept+fcntl if it gives ENOSYS.
Is a configure-time AS_RUN_IFELSE test good enough to find which systems actually support SOCK_CLOEXEC? If I'm understanding correctly, the runtime test is only needed on systems where SOCK_CLOEXEC is defined, but the kernel is too old to support it. Or are you saying that it is possible to compile on a newer glibc, then run with the same libc.so but against an older kernel, where the result of a configure-time test is no longer accurate? - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake e...@byu.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqRcjwACgkQ84KuGfSFAYBs9ACeKXESOj14U9WexWg1szqYQucJ tsYAoKO5d3v+xNPFImetH1dZPR14ghkF =MXDA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
