Hello, * Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:45:26PM CEST: > Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org> writes: > > The definition of NULL is a particularly thorny area, because so many > > headers > > use it and so many headers define it. I don't think it's worth the trouble - > > It wasn't _that_ much trouble.
Just to know whether the trouble was spent well: did you report a bug with NetBSD? Their fixing their headers would be nice, even with your patch, and one would hope it wouldn't be a lot of trouble either. Thanks, Ralf
