On Thu August 6 2009 12:36:06 Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Thu August 6 2009 12:16:58 Jim Meyering wrote: > > Kamil Dudka wrote: > > > On Thu July 30 2009 13:57:00 Jim Meyering wrote: > > >> > The attached incremental patch fixes it. Now it works on both Fedora > > >> > and Debian. But unfortunately it does not work with the stable > > >> > version (4.4.2) of findutils. Could anybody point me to the relevant > > >> > change in findutils code? Thanks in advance! > > >> > > >> With the FTS_CWDFD-adding change you spotted, > > >> I suspect that you should be using an FD-based function, > > >> like getfileconat or lgetfileconat from coreutils. > > > > > > It's probably always better to use a FD-based function when working > > > with an opened file. However this is not the case I think. Only FD of > > > the traversed directory is available when getfilecon() is called. If I > > > want to use FD of an opened file, I need to open the file first. Then > > > I am obviously encountering the same problem with relative paths. > > > > With FTS_CWDFD, the working directory does not change. > > Instead, fts->fts_cwd_fd is what changes. > > You can use getfileconat (fts->fts_cwd_fd, relative_name, &context) to > > get the desired context. > > Thanks for the explanation! But the module selinux-at does not seem to be > in gnulib. How can I then use it within findutils? I guess it's not good > idea to copy the code to findutils repo...
I can see it's heavily based on modules openat and selinux-h which are available in gnulib. Anyway what's the reason why the selinux-at module is not included in gnulib? Would by possible to move it from coreutils to gnulib? Kamil
