Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> writes: > Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Given that the parameter is called --version-script, I think >> "version-script" would be a better name for the module. > > Even the suffix "-script" is a bit of a misnomer, IMO. I would call it > 'symbol-versions'. If you agree with that, I'll rename the 'visbility' > module to 'symbol-visibility', for consistency.
Sounds good, please do it. OTOH, "symbol" has many meanings, so maybe "library-symbol-versions" or "libsymbol-versions" would reduce potential for collisions, but the name becomes quite long so I don't like it. >> It seems (a) has already been fixed right? > > Nearly. Forgot to commit doc/gnulib.texi yesterday. Now I merged with your > commit: Thanks. /Simon