Eric Blake wrote:
> > +static wchar_t wstring[] = { 'a', 'b', 'c', 0 };
>
> Are we guaranteed that on all platforms, 'a' promotes to L'a'? Or should
> we explicitly write the latter?
It is guaranteed: ISO C 99 paragraph 7.17.(2) says:
"wchar_t
... is an integer type whose range of values can represent distinct codes
for all members of the largest extended character set speciļ¬ed among the
supported locales; the null character shall have the code value zero and
each member of the basic character set shall have a code value equal to its
value when used as the lone character in an integer character constant."
The "basic character set" is defined in section 5.2.1.
In practice, btowc(x) == x for all x in the ASCII range (0 <= x < 128).
> Should we also test that %S serves as a synonym for %ls?
I'd say, it's not useful. %S is specified only in POSIX, not in ISO C99, and
the direvtives are equivalent. Users can use %ls.
Bruno
