Hi Robert, > > The patch is not correct, AFAIK: There is also a triple > > i386-unknown-netbsd-gnu, > > which differs from i386-unknown-knetbsd-gnu in the choice of its libc: it > > uses > > NetBSD's libc instead of GNU libc. > > The latest updates that can be found for this port date from 2002. I believe > it is defunct now. I think I'll contact its former maintainers and try to > have > this clarified.
Even if this port does not exist any more, the rule for future ports is quite clear from the past: kfoobar-gnu systems use GNU libc, whereas foobar-gnu systems use another libc. "*-gnu" is a too wide wildcard when you want to test for a system with GNU libc. Still, this is only a guess about the future. In the end, RMS still decides case-by-case. Bruno
