[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: > I was surprised to see the "1.2" used in so many places. The Emacs > manual, for example, has this in subfiles: > > @c This is part of the Emacs manual. > @c Copyright (C) 1985, 1986, 1987, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1997, 1999, 2000, > @c 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Free Software > @c Foundation, Inc.. > @c See file emacs.texi for copying conditions. > > Is there a reason not to adopt that convention here?
In general I would prefer that as well, but maybe the reason is that the *.texi files are re-used outside of the gnulib.texi? This is definitely true for getdate.texi: the file is added to packages via the getdate module. I'm using this in GNU Shishi, its manual contains an appendix with the getdate.texi information. /Simon
