Jim Meyering wrote: > This is a good change. So I applied it,
> Whether to replace all existing __attribute__ ((__attribute__)) > uses with _UNUSED_PARAMETER_ is a harder call. There's no immediate need to do so. Bruno
Jim Meyering wrote: > This is a good change. So I applied it,
> Whether to replace all existing __attribute__ ((__attribute__)) > uses with _UNUSED_PARAMETER_ is a harder call. There's no immediate need to do so. Bruno